Post by account_disabled on Jan 10, 2024 5:45:32 GMT -5
presumption of innocence, reasonableness and proportionality, for a criminal record to be established, a definitive criminal sentence is required. reproduction Candidate was fined in 2019 for driving under the influence of alcohol Reproduction Thus, judge Fernando de Mello Xavier, substitute at the Court of Justice of Goiás, authorized, in an injunction, last Tuesday (16/5), the return of a candidate for the public examination for the state Military Fire Department, even though with a traffic ticket for drunk driving. The author was eliminated in the previous life assessment and social investigation phase — the fourth .
and final stage of the competition for second class soldier — due to a fine obtained in 2019. He was considered unfit "for committing an a Phone Number List ct that was against morality and good mores". In an administrative appeal, which was denied, the candidate recalled the judgment in which the Federal Supreme Court decided that police reports, police investigations or even ongoing criminal actions do not justify elimination in the social investigation phase of a public competition. In court, lawyer Daniel Assunção , responsible for the defense, highlighted that there is no criminal conviction or even ongoing proceedings .
against the candidate. He presented negative criminal certificates and antecedents, as already stipulated in the notice. Xavier checked the "plausibility of the legal thesis" and confirmed that there was not even an investigation or criminal proceedings. "The offense occurred only at the administrative level, with the imposition of a traffic fine", he indicated. The judge also highlighted that the publication of the final result and the classification were "on the verge of being published". Click here to read the decision .
and final stage of the competition for second class soldier — due to a fine obtained in 2019. He was considered unfit "for committing an a Phone Number List ct that was against morality and good mores". In an administrative appeal, which was denied, the candidate recalled the judgment in which the Federal Supreme Court decided that police reports, police investigations or even ongoing criminal actions do not justify elimination in the social investigation phase of a public competition. In court, lawyer Daniel Assunção , responsible for the defense, highlighted that there is no criminal conviction or even ongoing proceedings .
against the candidate. He presented negative criminal certificates and antecedents, as already stipulated in the notice. Xavier checked the "plausibility of the legal thesis" and confirmed that there was not even an investigation or criminal proceedings. "The offense occurred only at the administrative level, with the imposition of a traffic fine", he indicated. The judge also highlighted that the publication of the final result and the classification were "on the verge of being published". Click here to read the decision .